MTU archaeologists
kept this blog during their excavation blog during their excavations
at the site of Frederick Petersen's 2nd Ward Pottery in Salt Lake
City, Utah, during July of 2005. Tim Scarlett and Chris Merritt
posted their thoughts and images here throughout the dig.
Tim's final thoughts on July's fieldwork are below on this page,
but you can still read along by jumping to week 1 and starting from
there. The research will continue into the lab and we'll continue
to post weekly developments as we learn new things. Starting
in late August, you'll find the lab blog linked here.
Jump back to week
1 (the beginning).
Jump back to week
2
Jump back to week
3
July 31st, 2005: Timothy Scarlett
This Is The Place Park
staff backfilled the excavation units this morning and another park
crew will spread new topsoil and lay sod on Monday morning.
Our landowner will have his yard back instead of a 4m x 4m hole
with two huge backdirt piles. I managed to finish the drawings
and closing photos over the past two days. Chris and I are
both eager to move things back into the lab to continue analysis.

The peels both turned
out pretty good. I've packed them flat for transport back
to the lab. the sediment on the site was pretty coarse, so
the rubber wouldn't roll without stressing the chunks of clinker
and wrought iron nails stuck within it. You can see the picture
of one of the peels below:

That peel captured the
strata under the parking area. You can see a 1 meter section
of the sidewall in the picture below. I really can't believe
how much of the site remains well preserved.

Remember that our current
interpretation of the strata hinges on the clay layer dating to
about 1900 when Frederick Petersen died, the clinker underneath
from the 1890s-1880s, the sediment under the clinker from the 1880s-1870s,
the roof tile and clay layer from the 1860s, and the clay undine
all from before 1860. We'll see if that interpretation holds
up in the lab as we begin analysis of the artifacts and sediment
samples.

The picture above provides
a good overview of the dig's ending. The walls are clearly
visible, including the small extension we dug to show the top of
the wall. The site produced just over 50 bags of artifacts
for analysis, many of them were pottery wasters, kiln furniture,
or other fragments related to the business. We also found
lots of dietary bone, which surprised us in such a large quantity.
After reflecting upon
the dig during the past three days of drawing, mapping, and photographing,
I thought I would record some of the interesting odd things Chris
and I have learned. Keep in mind that in archaeology "the
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!" In other
words, just because you don't find purple-spotted Martian space
ship fragments in your excavation, you can not conclude that purple-spotted
Martian space ships don't exist. :
1. It seems that
neither Frederick Petersen nor any of the family members smoked.
We found only one small fragment of a white clay tobacco pipe and
would expect to find many more at a work site. Smoking was
quite common before the World of Wisdom doctrine became widely practiced
among Utah's LDS households. The Petersens don't seem to have
smoked very much, or at least not in this part of their workshops.
2. We didn't find
a single tin can. If we'd been surveying at a mining town
in the Great Basin from this time period, we'd have surveyed hundreds
or even thousands of cans and can fragments. Even in the city's
heart, a local agricultural population does not buy many of the
processed and packaged food stuffs available during that time.
Perhaps, however, they just reused the cans or dumped them somewhere
else.
3. The tile and clay form
a sturdy platform for something. While a few clay working
machines can be heavy and might require such a foundation, I also
suspect that other things may have sat upon the platform.
It was about the size and shape for a small forge one might see
in near the horse barn on a working farm. We'll examine the
clay samples closely. Forging casts off tiny little bits of
metal into the air around it. We'll find them with magnets
and examine them under the microscope. We'll see what we discover.
4. We've got some clay
samples to compare against his pottery fragments. The changes
in the chemistry might help us to understand if the clay used in
the architecture is the same clay as the pots.
5. We did not find
his kiln remains, but more importantly we didn't hit his waster
pile. I would expect that forty years of production would
have left many more wasters which failed in the kiln during firing.
Perhaps Frederick had a very low failure rate. We'll see why
the samples we have were rejected and that might help us to understand.
We'll keep posting to
the blog now that we've entered into the lab phase of the work.
Chris or I will make updates about once per week through the fall
semester. You'll find the lab blog linked from here starting
in late August.
I hope you enjoyed the
blog during the excavation! We'll try to do this again when
we return for more excavations exploring Utah's cultures during
the nineteenth century.
Cheers,
Tim Scarlett

Jump back to week
1.
Jump back to week
2.
Jump back to week
3.

Contact
Details:
Utah Pottery Project
Timothy James
Scarlett, Director
Department of
Social Sciences
Michigan Technological
University
1400 Townsend
Ave
Houghton, MI 49931
Phone: (906)487-2359
Fax: (906)487-2468
email: scarlett@mtu.edu
|